NATION’S LEADING HUMAN FACTORS Litigation CONSULTANT
Litigation Focus Groups, PLLC. is designed to transition aviation human factors to your litigation development and trial model. We are experts at deploying that development and trial model throughout your case by utilizing basic neuroscience, fundamentals of instruction, and highly specialized imprinting techniques.
Jan Sawyer, THE PIONEER IN BRINGING AVIATION HUMAN FACTORS TO THE LITIGATION LANDSCAPE IN 2001.
Key case results: Class v. Flo Health/META, Gwen Mayo v. Dr. Susan Lacy $4,230,000.00, Erin Andrews v. Marriott ($55,000,000.00), Incrocci v. Family Care, PC (with Dr. Monique Casey-Bolden providing care)($6,800,000.00), Yebuah v. Center for Urological Treatment ($4,500,000.00) Johnson v. Heartland of Springfield, Ohio (defense consult, defense verdict), Wade v. Lowry, et. al ($15,200,000.00), Paule v. Genesis Genetics, ($13,000,000.00), Cisson v. Bard, Vaginal Mesh 3rdBellwether trial ($2,000,000.00), Gayden v. Vanderbilt ($2,000,000.00), EEOC V. Mid-America Specialties ($1,500,000.00), Monroe v. FTS (for the class), EEOC v. Old Dominion (for Claimant), DelToro v. Manor Care, et al. (defense consult, defense verdict).
Litigation Consultant in Cisson v. Bard, the inception case of the now nationally utilized and phrase-coined “MSDS Litigation” currently driving the talc powder litigation, specifically in Echeverria v. Johnson and Johnson ($417,000,000.00); Harriot v. Ross Stores, $5,250,000.00 (Atlanta, Georgia), Ramsey v. Manor Care (defense verdict, Toledo, Ohio).